Thermal shock

Buckling · Corrosion · Creep · Fatigue ·
Fouling · Fracture · Hydrogen embrittlement ·
Impact · Mechanical overload ·
Stress corrosion cracking · Thermal shock · Wear · Yielding

Thermal shock is the name given to cracking as a result of rapid temperature change. Glass and ceramic objects are particularly vulnerable to this form of failure, due to their low toughness, low thermal conductivity, and high thermal expansion coefficients. However, they are used in many high temperature applications due to their high melting point.

Thermal shock occurs when a thermal gradient causes different parts of an object to expand by different amounts. This differential expansion can be understood in terms of stress or of strain, equivalently. At some point, this stress overcomes the strength of the material, causing a crack to form. If nothing stops this crack from propagating through the material, it will cause the object's structure to fail.

Thermal shock can be prevented by:

  1. Reducing the thermal gradient seen by the object, by
    1. changing its temperature more slowly
    2. increasing the material's thermal conductivity
  2. Reducing the material's coefficient of thermal expansion
  3. Increasing its strength
  4. Decreasing its Young's modulus
  5. Increasing its toughness, by
    1. crack tip blunting, i.e., plasticity or phase transformation
    2. crack deflection

Contents

Effect on materials

Borosilicate glass is made to withstand thermal shock better than most other glass through a combination of reduced expansion coefficient and greater strength, though fused quartz outperforms it in both these respects. Some glass-ceramic materials (mostly in LAS system[1]) include a controlled proportion of material with a negative expansion coefficient, so that the overall coefficient can be reduced to almost exactly zero over a reasonably wide range of temperatures.

Reinforced carbon-carbon is extremely resistant to thermal shock, due to graphite's extremely high thermal conductivity and low expansion coefficient, the high strength of carbon fiber, and a reasonable ability to deflect cracks within the structure.

To measure thermal shock the impulse excitation technique proved to be a useful tool. It can be used to measure Young's modulus, Shear modulus, Poisson's ratio and damping coefficient in a non destructive way. The same test-piece can be measured after different thermal shock cycles and this way the detoriation in physical properties can be mapped out.

Relative robustness of materials

The robustness of a material to thermal shock is characterized with the thermal shock parameter:[2]

R_{\mathrm{T}} = \frac{k\sigma_{\mathrm{T}}(1-\nu)}{\alpha E}\,,

where

Thermal shock parameter in the physics of solid-state lasers

The laser gain medium generates heat. This heat is drained through the heat sink. The transfer of heat occurs at certain temperature gradient. The non-uniform thermal expansion of a bulk material causes the stress and tension, which may break the device even at slow change of the temperature. (for example, continuous-wave operation). This phenomenon is also called thermal shock. The robustness of a laser material to the thermal shock is characterized with the thermal shock parameter. [2] (see above)

Roughly, at the efficient operation of laser, the power P_{\mathrm{h}} of heat generated in the gain medium is proportional to the output power P_{\mathrm{s}} of the laser, and the coefficient q of proportionality can be interpreted as heat generation parameter; then, P_{\mathrm{h}}=q P_{\mathrm{s}}. The heat generation parameter is basically determined by the quantum defect of the laser action, and one can estimate q=1-\omega_{\mathrm{s}}/\omega_{\mathrm{p}}, where \omega_{\mathrm{p}} and \omega_{\mathrm{s}} are frequency of the pump and that of the lasing.

Then, for the layer of the gain medium placed at the heat sink, the maximal power can be estimated as

P_{\mathrm{s, max}} = 3 \frac{R_{\mathrm{T}}}{q} \frac{L^2}{h},\,

where h is thickness of the layer and L is the transversal size. This estimate assumes the unilateral heat drain, as it takes place in the active mirrors. For the double-side sink, the coefficient 4 should be applied.

Thermal loading

The estimate above is not the only parameter which determines the limit of overheating of a gain medium. The maximal raise \Delta T of temperature, at which the medium still can efficiently lase, is also important property of the laser material. This overheating limits the maximal power with estimate

P_{\mathrm{s, max}} = 2 \frac {k \Delta T}{q} \frac{L^2}{h}\,

Combination of the two estimates above of the maximal power gives the estimate

P_{\mathrm{s, max}} = R \frac{L^2}{h}\,

where


R= \textrm{min}
\left\{
\begin{array}{c}
  3 R_{\mathrm{T}}/q\\
  2 k\Delta T/q
\end{array}
\right.

is thermal loading; parameter, which is important property of the laser material. The thermal loading, saturation intensity Q and the loss \beta determine the limit of power scaling of the disk lasers .[4] Roughly, the maximal power at the optimised sizes L and h, is of order of P=\frac{R^2}{Q\beta^3}. This estimate is very sensitive to the loss \beta. However, the same expression can be interpreted as a robust estimate of the upper bound of the loss ~\beta~ required for the desirable output power P:

~\beta_{\mathrm{max}}=\left(\frac{R^2}{PQ}\right)^{\frac{1}{3}}.

All the disk lasers reported work at the round-trip loss below this estimate.[3] The thermal shock parameter and the loading depend of the temperature of the heat sink. Certain hopes are related with a laser, operating at cryogenic temperatures. The corresponding Increase of the thermal shock parameter would allow to softer requirements for the round-trip loss of the disk laser at the power scaling.

Examples of thermal shock failure

See also

References

  1. ^ Scott L. Swartz, Ceramics having negative coefficient of thermal expansion, method of making such ceramics, and parts made from such ceramics, United States Patent 6066585
  2. ^ a b W.F.Krupke; M.D. Shinn, J.E. Marion, J.A. Caird, and S.E. Stokowski (1986). "Spectroscopic, optical, and thermomechanical properties of neodymium- and chromium-doped gadolinium scandium gallium garnet" (abstract). JOSAB 3 (1): 102–114. doi:10.1364/JOSAB.3.000102. http://josab.osa.org/abstract.cfm?id=3938. 
  3. ^ a b D.Kouznetsov; J.-F.Bisson (2008). "Role of the undoped cap in the scaling of a thin disk laser". JOSA B 25 (3): 338–345. doi:10.1364/JOSAB.25.000338. http://www.opticsinfobase.org/abstract.cfm?URI=josab-25-3-338. 
  4. ^ D. Kouznetsov; J.F. Bisson, J. Dong, and K. Ueda (2006). "Surface loss limit of the power scaling of a thin-disk laser" (abstract). JOSAB 23 (6): 1074–1082. Bibcode 2006JOSAB..23.1074K. doi:10.1364/JOSAB.23.001074. http://josab.osa.org/abstract.cfm?id=90157. Retrieved 2007-01-26. ; [1]